The heft and feel of a well-worn handle,
The sight of shavings that curl from a blade;
The logs in the wood pile, the sentiment of huge beams in an old-fashioned house;
The smell of fresh cut timber and the pungent fragrance of burning leaves;
The crackle of kindling and the hiss of burning logs.
Abundant to all the needs of man, how poor the world would be
Without wood.

Everard Hinrichs, quoted by Eric Sloane in A Reverence for Wood


Friday, February 22, 2013

Better Days Ahead

Earlier this week I received the following email...
"I'm a tree farmer in Southern Indiana and Central Kentucky. I think that one of the biggest problems that the NRDC and other environmental groups have in understanding forests is that they think of timber as being a natural resource instead of a agricultural crop. The only real difference between raising a crop of timber and a crop of corn is the length of time to maturity. By classifying timber as a natural resource instead of a crop, they set it up for being idolized instead of being used. 
Markets for hardwood timber stumpage in my area are so bad, and have been for a long time, that I am starting to think that long-term timber management is not economically possible and is purely pie-in-the-sky. Stumpage prices for timber in Indiana and Kentucky are the same as they were 30 years ago, and inflation has increased more than 100%. 
I'm in the process of seriously considering liquidating my holdings and putting my investment elsewhere. Even if wood demand tripled over night, I'm not sure if I would begin to get back what I've lost to inflation. What is your opinion as to what is going on in the marketplace, and is my assessment of timber economics correct? 
I pondered it for a couple of days, and when I got back in my office this morning I sent him the following reply...
"Hey, ..., thanks for sharing. I think you're right on, both with respect to what the environmentalists are missing and to timber markets.
If it is true that you couldn't make back your forest investment even if lumber prices tripled, then I can understand how liquidation would be tempting.  Before you do, though, a couple of thoughts...
There is no doubt that the Chinese economy has begun to improve our timber markets dramatically, and will continue to do so over the next decade. I have data that suggests that thus far, Chinese involvement in our markets has had the same relative impact [on lumber prices]as one million additional housing starts here in the U.S. True, the impact has been most dramatic on structural lumber, but we know that hardwood follows those price trends eventually. Our local hardwood sawmills (the ones that are still running) had good to excellent years last year and markets just seem to keep improving, slowly but surely. I think the pendulum is swinging back from a "biomass" outlook of forestry investment (one that would never pay, for the landowner) to a "sawlog" economy, as the Chinese pipeline becomes more and more established. So, things are looking brighter for our timber landowners, and companies marketing logs and lumber. Not so, unfortunately, for our secondary wood industries, which now have to compete against the giant purchasing (and manufacturing) force called "China" which seems to be able to buy anything it wants.
Second thought is, what other investments are out there that are so sure a thing that you can justify getting out of good timberland? Even James Grant, widely respected publisher of James Grant's Interest Rate Observer, startled the investment world last year when he suggested that a black walnut plantation would out-perform US Treasuries over the next thirty years. Most observers thought he was kidding, but in a shaky world, at least you know your trees are always adding capital. Which is better than what you can say about practically all other currency-based investments.
So if you can, hang on to your timberland. Better days are ahead."
And, I would add for you industry readers of Go Wood, my time on the road at mills and conferences in the last couple of months suggests that things are, in fact, beginning to look up. Our American economy seems to be as much about attitude as anything, and we're beginning to come to grips with certain new realities. And as we do, we will do what previous generations of Americans have always with it, and get on with business.


Anonymous said...

If you want to run the figures on owning forest land, go to
Its a slick system that takes away the manual calculations normally done. Its will show quickly that growing timber profit is a very difficult challenge.

The Corvallis Branch of the Edewards Family said...

As always you make a great point. I was at the Oregon Loggers Convention this morning and a very similar sentiment prevailed. Our investment dwindles every year as our produced timber value is outpaced by inflation.
Here on the left coast the threat of export keeps prices at least competitive, but the flip side to that purchasing behemoth across the Pacific is the home grown eco-nut who, as your letter writer intoned, views a log as a natural resource rather than a crop. The psychological response to seeing one of mother natures beautiful giants about to be sold to the evil polluting human rights violators is to call it a crime against our earthly home and the Lorax.
The logger, timber owner and sawyers all look at each other over a great breakfast provided by the local equipment sales company and ask the question, "What the heck can I do besides this?" Eventually they may be forced to answer that question as their livelihood is systematically taken away through economic turmoil and ill conceived legislation.

Anonymous said...

As a forester in central ky. for 40 years I agree with the idea that hardwood timber sales are depressing. The big problem I think is that most timber is sold on 50/50 shares and unfortunately for a number of reasons the landowners don't get their 50% of delivered log prices (lots of stolen timber, and shady deals struck between sawmill and independent loggers. The bottom line is logs can be had by the timber industry cheap, instead of having to pay landowners what the logs would be worth if these situations didn't occur? I know the amount of timber stolen because I do timber appriasals on theft. The shady deal situation and logs going to mills the landowner doesn't know about has been confirmed confirmed to me by honest independent loggers trying to compete with the shady dealers.